I find this article from the New York Times slightly disturbing.
If you haven’t read it, please do — it is long, enlightening, and profiles one family in particular from Beijing who was able to send their daughter to university in Ohio. But if you don’t have time to read it, here are the basics:
- Student overseas wants to go to American, Australian, Canadian, or UK university.
- American, Australian, Canadian, and UK universities want students from overseas because
• they pay way more tuition, and
• it diversifies their school culture, and
• they pay way more tuition, and… wait, I already said that. - So, Student pays X amount of USD to Agent to find him an appropriate university in the western world, and
- American, Australian, Canadian, and UK universities pay Y amount of USD to same Agent to find them Z number of international students because
• they pay way more tuition, and
• it diversifies their school culture, and
• did I mention that they pay way more tuition? - Agent finds appropriate fit, Student applies to University recommended by Agent, and is admitted.
- Student happy (found tertiary educational direction), University happy ($$$ + cultural diversity = better learning?).
- Agent happiest, because X + Y = BINGO.
The article states,
. . . [M]any agents collect hefty fees from both sides — the students they advise, and the universities they contract with — leaving some to question whose interest is being served . . .
To be fair, the next sentence implies that some people are working towards changing this perception:
Even some advocates of recruiting agents see a need for an ethics code.
And further,
“We should be doing this, but we should be doing it right,” said Mitch Leventhal, vice provost of international affairs at the University of Cincinnati, which has contracts with agents. “And I don’t think it’s right for students to have to pay a lot if the agent is also getting paid by the university. I don’t think it’s ethical.”
Umm, but you’re still doing it, aren’t you? Did the University of Cincinnati cut their contracts with the agents because Mr. Leventhal said it was unethical to pay them? (Note that the sentence above does not say if the University of Cincinnati pays the agents they have contracts with.)
At least one university representative thinks it is unethical and does not pay agents they have contracts with:
Throughout Asia and to a lesser extent other parts of the world, thousands of agents offer help to students seeking admission to an English-speaking university, charging them fees that may be a few hundred dollars, or far more. “Some agents charge as much as $30,000,” said John Robert Cryan of the University of Toledo, which works with agents, but pays no commissions. “There’s a lot of gouging going on.”
[emphasis mine]
Apparently, Mr. Leventhal (of the U of C, above) is an advocate of ethics in this field, but get this:
Mr. Leventhal is also advocating a code of ethics, modeled on Australian practice, under which American universities would pay agents a 10 percent commission, if the agents agreed to charge students only a nominal fee.
This is ethical? Am I missing something? Maybe an Aussie can explain it to me, as apparently this is Australian practice. To my mind, none of this is ethical. For students AND universities to pay for placement at “the right” university? Where does that leave the international (or local, for that matter) student who wants and rightly deserves a place in a university? Well, apparently, unless he has between $500 and $5000 US to spend — that leaves him nowhere.
On the last page of the article, Philip G. Altbach, director of the Center for International Higher Education at Boston College, is quoted as saying:
“In a globalized world, where some people need a lot of guidance to get here, there may be a legitimate place for responsible middlemen,” he said, then added, “although I really hate it.”
And I agree — perhaps there is a need for a middleman. But, but, but… here are my buts:
- Universities should NOT be paying them — what if instead they were simply “regular” university employees, out and about recruiting for their university as normal?
- Students should not have to pay them very much (like, less than $50), or even better nothing at all
Basically, I think that universities perhaps need to beef up their own recruitment practices, and aim to recruit international students the old-fashioned way — by making their university look like the best place to go, rather than by paying a middleman thousands of dollars.
Does anyone else think this is unethical? Or am I being too old-fashioned and curmudgeonly?
Whatever happened to open and honest application procedures? Whatever happened to applications requiring that the person with the best fit (based on grades, SAT scores, and whatever else the university deems necessary) gets in on his/ her own merit, rather than simply because he/she is from China and has thousands of dollars to spend?
Should people be making money from international students’ desire to go to university in the Western world?
Photo credit: Here. There. And Nowhere. by drp